When the United Nations references ‘sustainability’ people listen, governments listen, or politicians at each and every level listen and say; that feels like a really good idea. But, I dare ought to; would it be? Is it a smart idea to have some type of global government overseer telling us the most effective management practices to be as efficient as you can – while using the latest clean technologies? Suggesting things we could do to improve and ushering within a new age of global socialism.

Well, they could have fooled the next generation because of their educational indoctrination, but they also haven’t fooled me. Let’s discuss this which is a common topic of conversation at our think tank.

One real problem I have with Agenda 21 type concepts or even the Venus Project effortlessly its perceived efficient strategies is many master-planned communities crash, and tap into rural areas throughout the globe to supply their “city-state” (sometimes sanctuary cities) as it were.

Let’s take New York City (NYC) as an example takes virtually all the fresh water now from Upstate rivers, and power externally the city, food from your Midwest, it’s hardly just what the socialist leftist elite call “sustainable” nor are the majority of their intellectual designs, looks good used (written), but turn up useful info as well as promoted in real life – always problems with behavior (crime) once you pack a lot of rats (humans) too close together – that’s okay same happens with locusts and rats when their populations become too densely packed.

Without the resources these cities combine vast distances they develop into the worst human slums seen to mankind. Big cities tax the civilization for his or her needs, rural voters investing in inner-city bus systems, infrastructures, power systems, water depletion therefore the rural areas take care of the urban heat islands changing weather patterns hurting farming to give the masses inside the urban areas who hate them. It’s not working.

Agenda 21 plus the entire UN runs by elitists who truth be told aren’t nearly as smart or intellectual technocrats marketed to be, I think there ought to be a real downside to brain fog as a result of ambient noise and the actual environment, frequency pollution, socialist brainwashing. They have great plans, nevertheless they just won’t work, and then they double-down with increased brilliant ideas, much like the inventor who proclaims “free-energy” but could never produce it.

And never to get negative here, but I’d like to view a plan that is certainly actually feasible, otherwise might know about have may be the opposite of the Ends and Means Debate for the reason that; If you do everything in the fair way, and often will not achieve your desired ends, then a whole thing is often a waste of time, which can be actually worse than violating ethics inside means to find the desired ends.

But in either case, these concepts floated to date whether in the WFS, Technocrats, UN Habitat, DESERATEC TREC, etc. are nice concepts in planning and filled with ideas, but void of reality check. And don’t do not understand the Venus Project is “obviously” the smartest solution to build a city, also it makes sense but there is really a whole lot more towards the needs of an human ant farm. Please think with this.